Operations over people is its own ACS task with seventeen knowledge elements, which tells you how much of the exam it can occupy. The practical stakes match: a two-pound aircraft falling from 200 feet arrives at roughly 60 miles per hour.
Start from the default, which is a prohibition. No person may operate a small unmanned aircraft over a human being unless one of three things is true.
Two words in (b) carry weight. Covered means a roof overhead, not an awning a drone would punch through. Stationary means parked — the moment that vehicle moves, § 107.145 governs instead.
Note also what the rule does not say. Part 107 sets no minimum lateral distance from a person; it restricts flight over people. Whether flying 15 feet beside a crowd is safe is answered by § 107.19(c) and § 107.23, not by a number in the CFR.
Candidates hunt for the minimum distance Part 107 requires from a non-participating person. There is none. If an option offers a specific number of feet as a required lateral standoff, it is wrong.
Which of these people may a small unmanned aircraft lawfully fly directly over without meeting any Subpart D category?
Answer: B. Section 107.39(a) allows flight over a human being who is directly participating in the operation, which includes the visual observer. An open-sided canopy is not a covered structure providing reasonable protection from a falling aircraft, and a car stopped at a light is still a moving vehicle in traffic rather than a stationary one — § 107.145 governs that case.
Subpart D turns repeatedly on the phrase sustained flight over. Crossing above a person in transit is treated differently from hovering or orbiting above them. The FAA publishes no stopwatch figure; the test is loitering over people versus passing above them on the way somewhere else.
Under § 107.110 the aircraft must weigh 0.55 pounds or less on takeoff and throughout the duration of each operation, including everything attached, and must have no exposed rotating parts that would lacerate human skin on impact. Category 1 needs no declaration of compliance and no label — its practical distinction from Categories 2 and 3.
The phrase throughout the duration of each operation is not decoration. Add a lens filter, prop guards, or a payload to a 245-gram aircraft and you can push it out of Category 1 without changing anything else.
These are defined by how hard the aircraft hits rather than by what it weighs. Kinetic energy is the energy of a moving object; it rises with mass and with the square of speed, so a light aircraft moving fast can be as dangerous as a heavier one moving slowly.
| Category | Section | Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Category 2 | § 107.120(a)(1) | Will not cause injury to a human being that is equivalent to or greater than the severity of injury caused by a transfer of 11 foot-pounds of kinetic energy upon impact from a rigid object |
| Category 3 | § 107.130(a)(1) | Will not cause injury to a human being that is equivalent to or greater than the severity of the injury caused by a transfer of 25 foot-pounds of kinetic energy upon impact from a rigid object |
Both add two design requirements identical to Category 1's: no exposed rotating parts that would lacerate human skin, and no safety defects. Both also require the same three-part paperwork chain.
Acceptance is not permanent. If the FAA finds an aircraft no longer meets the category it was declared for, it issues a notice of proposed rescission — and the holder gets a say. The two clocks are worth knowing, because the exam likes process questions where every option sounds procedurally plausible.
Two traps live here. The first is the option saying the holder must stop distribution immediately with no chance to respond — wrong, there is a 30-day window to show compliance. The second is any option routing this to the NTSB: appeals to the NTSB are how an action against *your airman certificate* is challenged, not how a manufacturer's declaration of compliance is handled. Section 107.160(f) also rules out part 13 subpart D, so neither route is right.
The FAA notifies a declaration holder that it proposes to rescind the declaration. In a non-emergency case, what does the holder get?
Answer: B. Section 107.160(d) gives 30 calendar days from issuance of the notice to demonstrate compliance; 107.160(e) allows a petition to reconsider within 60 days of a rescission on new material facts, FAA factual error, or misinterpretation of law. Section 107.160(f) expressly excludes part 13 subpart D.
The DoC applicant also owes remote pilot operating instructions, made available on sale or transfer, covering the system description, allowable modifications, and mode-change procedures — plus a product support and notification process for defects.
Your side of the chain is short. Confirm the aircraft is listed on an FAA-accepted declaration of compliance, confirm it is labeled, and follow the operating instructions. If the label is damaged or missing, § 107.135 makes it your job: label the aircraft in English, legible, prominent, and remaining on it for the duration of the operation, identifying every category it qualifies for.
A manufacturer wants an aircraft accepted for Category 2 operations. What must it establish first?
Answer: B. Section 107.155 requires a means of compliance — test, analysis, or inspection — to be submitted and accepted before a declaration of compliance can rely on it. Airworthiness certification under Part 21 is the Category 4 route and has no role in Categories 2 and 3.
Category 3 buys a higher energy allowance and pays for it with operating limits. Under § 107.125, a Category 3 aircraft may operate above a human being only if:
A closed- or restricted-access site is one where the operator controls who enters — a fenced construction site, a private film set, a factory yard. Access control alone is not enough: the people inside must be on notice, through signage at the entrances, a site induction, or an announcement.
Category 3's hardest limit: an aircraft operating under Category 3 must not operate over an open-air assembly of human beings at all. Not briefly, not with Remote ID, not with notice. It is the most reliable Category 3 exam point.
Section 107.140 is the outlier. A Category 4 aircraft must hold an airworthiness certificate issued under Part 21 — the framework that certificates manned aircraft, and the reason § 107.2 carves out this one exception. There is no weight limit and no kinetic energy threshold.
It must be operated within the operating limitations of the approved Flight Manual, and those limitations must not prohibit operations over human beings. Category 4 also carries a maintenance regime under § 107.140(c): use the manufacturer's maintenance manual or FAA-approved methods, keep records of the work, the date, and who performed it, track life-limited parts, inspection status, and airworthiness directive compliance, retain records for one year, and transfer the life-limited parts and AD records with the aircraft.
That answers a knowledge element on its own. For Categories 1, 2, and 3 the maintenance rule is the ordinary Part 107 one — the § 107.15 condition-for-safe-operation check plus the manufacturer's instructions. Only Category 4 imports formal recordkeeping.
| Category 1 | Category 2 | Category 3 | Category 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Limit | 0.55 lb or less at takeoff and throughout | 11 ft-lb transferred kinetic energy | 25 ft-lb transferred kinetic energy | No weight or energy limit |
| Exposed rotating parts that would lacerate skin | Prohibited | Prohibited | Prohibited | Governed by the airworthiness certificate |
| Safety defects | — | Prohibited | Prohibited | Governed by the airworthiness certificate |
| Declaration of compliance | Not required | Required | Required | Not applicable |
| Label required | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Airworthiness certificate | No | No | No | Yes — Part 21 |
| Sustained flight over an open-air assembly | Allowed only if the operation meets § 89.110 or § 89.115(a) | Allowed only if the operation meets § 89.110 or § 89.115(a) | Prohibited outright | Allowed only if the operation meets § 89.110 or § 89.115(a) |
| Sustained flight over people generally | Permitted | Permitted | Closed site with notice, or no sustained flight over non-participants | Per the approved Flight Manual |
The Remote ID condition in that table deserves its own sentence. Sustained flight over an open-air assembly under Category 1, 2, or 4 requires the operation to meet § 89.110 (standard Remote ID) or § 89.115(a) (broadcast module). A FRIA does not satisfy it — a FRIA is where nothing is broadcast.
Flying over a person inside a moving vehicle gets its own section. It is permitted only if the operation qualifies under Category 1, 2, 3, or 4 and, for Categories 1, 2, and 3, throughout the operation the aircraft either:
In practice a highway crossing is generally fine, because the aircraft transits and does not loiter. Following a moving car down a public road to film it is not, unless the road is closed and the occupants notified. That is why car commercials are shot on closed courses.
Operations over people at night are permitted, and require both rule sets at once: the applicable Subpart D category and § 107.29's lighting and post-April-2021 training. Darkness also makes it harder to see who has wandered into the area.
Selecting the operational area is the part no regulation can do for you. Before launch: where would the aircraft land if the motors quit now; is there a route to the subject that avoids crossing above people; can you cordon the launch zone; who controls site access. Then brief every participant, because § 107.49(b) requires it.
Which category of small unmanned aircraft must have an airworthiness certificate issued by the FAA?
Answer: C. Section 107.140(b)(1) requires a Category 4 aircraft to hold an airworthiness certificate issued under Part 21. Categories 1, 2, and 3 do not — Category 1 is defined by weight, and Categories 2 and 3 by demonstrated impact kinetic energy under an accepted means of compliance.
Even where the category permits it, the smart plan keeps the aircraft off the crowd line. Fly parallel to a crowd rather than across it, put the path over the street or the roof, and treat category eligibility as your margin for the unexpected rather than your operating plan.